“WNL.” What gets asked about a checkbox assessment, and what to chart instead
Exhibit 11 a checkbox in the assessment
WNL.
Within normal limits of what, and when did you look? WNL says a finding matched your unit's definition. It does not show the value, what changed, or what is normal for this patient.
What they ask about it
A nurses' liability insurer (NSO), on how a plaintiff's attorney reads thin exception charting
Does this document tell the full story of the patient’s condition and of our professional assessment and care?
Nurses’ notes with few explanations, little description of key findings, or no mention of periodic patient checks could be construed as negligence by a plaintiff’s attorney guided by the premise, not charted, not done.
A legal nurse consultant at Med League, a firm that supplies expert witnesses to trial lawyers
And what if a “normal” finding in the definitions is abnormal for the patient?
And what if a “normal” finding in the definitions is abnormal for the patient? Will improvements be missed in a patient who is normally short of breath and is no longer short of breath? ... Nursing defendants may explain missing documentation by stating they chart by exception.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
After back surgery a nurse noted a “very bloody” bandage, and later pain at the incision, but the hospital had told nurses to chart by exception, so there were no notes for every shift. The jury could find that the gaps delayed the diagnosis of the infection, and the appeals court let the verdict stand.
one former nurse at the Hospital who attended to Romero in 1986 testified that, under the charting by exception policy, she would not report a patient’s pain if she either did not administer any medicine or simply gave the patient an aspirin-type medication (as opposed to a narcotic). ... the jury could have reasonably inferred that intermittent charting failed to provide the sort of continuous danger signals that would be the most likely spur to early intervention by a physician.
U.S. District Court, Western District of New York · 2012
Two plaintiffs tied to a nursing home in Rochester sued New York State Department of Health employees, claiming retaliation that ended with the home's closure. The court quoted a final report by state investigators (MFCU): at the hearing, the home's charting by exception was the core issue, and the thin record made the care look poor until testimony and interviews said otherwise.
The core issue the ALJ continually referred to was Beechwood’s policy of charting by exception [a record-keeping procedure]. Due to the lack of documentation, it appeared that poor care was given. However, testimony during the hearing and interviews conducted by our office refuted that contention.
Write instead
1400: Lower abdominal dressing intact with 3 × 2 cm area of serosanguineous drainage, unchanged from 1200. Incision not visualized beneath dressing.
Observations call for specific detail: Record the color, consistency and quantity of wound drainage—“about the size of a quarter,” for example— rather than noting only that the dressing was “very bloody.”
Every change shows. The record keeps the time of each entry and each deletion.
Correct your charting errors in accordance with your organization’s policies and procedures, ensuring that it is clearly marked as a late entry. Remember: electronic healthcare records automatically date and time each entry and identify electronic deletions, so any attempt to alter the patient healthcare information record is discoverable.
Not to protect yourself. A note added after an incident to cover the gap reads as guilt.
Don’t chart defensively after an incident has occurred. This is a red flag to lawyers later on. Defensive charting is not necessarily going to stand up in court as actual evidence of negligence, but it does telegraph the message that you believe you were at fault, and that’s the red flag the lawyers will be looking for.
Got a subpoena or a deposition notice? Call your liability insurer and your risk manager before anything else.
The first action nursing professionals should take is to inform their professional liability insurance provider and employer’s risk manager or legal counsel of the deposition notice.
The hospital's lawyer is not your lawyer. They represent your employer.
Keep in mind that this attorney is not your attorney, but is your employer’s attorney; therefore, you may wish to retain a board certified healthcare attorney or a litigation attorney to be “on your side” for the deposition.
You can describe your routine. What you always do is evidence too, but it is weaker than the note.
You can speak about your custom and practice in general at deposition, but there is no substitute for a well-written note and initialed treatment boxes.
Not legal advice. Your facility policy, your state and your
own attorney are what bind you. Every question and every quote here links to
where it was published; read the source, not us. Written by a med-surg RN,
ten years, day shift. Why there is no name on it.