On the stand · 10 of 12

“Patient educated, verbalizes understanding.” What a court asks about teaching you only named

Patient educated, verbalizes understanding.

Educated on what, and what did the patient say back? The phrase records that you taught. It does not show what you covered or what the patient could explain or do. Years later, when nobody remembers the patient, it is all the chart has.

What they ask about it

It happened in court

Almonte v Shaukat

Appellate Division, First Department (New York) · 2022

The chart recorded a recommendation to follow up for an ultrasound and mammogram, but the discharge form she signed did not contain that plan. Neither the triage nurse nor the physician assistant remembered her, and she denied seeing the nurse again after triage. The appeals court unanimously reversed the dismissal of the case: what, if anything, she was told at discharge was a disputed fact.

Although defendants produced a signed discharge instruction form, the form does not contain the treatment plan that is otherwise set out in plaintiff's chart. The signed form makes reference to a breast cyst and provides a follow-up location for a breast clinic without further instruction. Neither Varas nor Rogan had an independent recollection of their examination or treatment of plaintiff, and plaintiff denied seeing Varas again after the triage.

Silva v. Baptist Health South Florida, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017

Deaf patients sued two hospitals under the ADA and the Rehabilitation Act, saying they could not communicate effectively with hospital staff. The lower court relied on records saying they verbalized understanding of treatment and discharge instructions. The appeals court said a charted “verbalized understanding” at most showed the point was disputed, and a disputed material fact goes to a jury. It reversed and remanded.

Further, as we have explained, evidence that the medical staff could ascertain a patient’s basic symptoms and convey treatment instructions is not enough for us to conclude, as a matter of law, that a disabled patient’s level of informational exchange was equal to that of non-disabled patients as required by the ADA and RA.

Write instead

Reviewed 3 new meds (metoprolol, furosemide, KCl). Teach-back: pt named each med, its purpose and dose, and stated she will hold metoprolol and call if HR under 55.

Documenting discharge teaching so the chart shows the patient understood

Already charted it this way?

Not legal advice. Your facility policy, your state and your own attorney are what bind you. Every question and every quote here links to where it was published; read the source, not us. Written by a med-surg RN, ten years, day shift. Why there is no name on it.