On the stand · 8 of 12

“Will continue to monitor.” What a court asks about monitoring you only promised

Will continue to monitor.

Monitor what, and how often? It promises a check without naming it. If no timed entry follows, the chart shows you planned to look and nothing shows that you did.

What they ask about it

It happened in court

Estate of Sahar v. 301 Union Street, LLC (Care One at Wellington)

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division · 2026

After an unwitnessed fall at night, the nurse found the resident “fine” and staff would “continue to monitor.” Her daughter found her in pain the next morning, and the hospital diagnosed a hip fracture. The jury did not find the fall itself negligent, but found a violation of the resident rights law, and the $525,000 award was affirmed. Among the evidence the court listed: staff failed to conduct adequate checks that would have revealed the fracture sooner.

After Renee fell, staff telephoned a doctor, who advised how to check Renee's extremities and temperature. The nurse determined Renee was "fine" and returned her to bed, where staff would "continue to monitor." Renee was administered acetaminophen in response to her complaint that her "head and body hurt[]."

Wickham v. Hummel

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District · 2022

The nurse said she did the ordered neurovascular check but never charted it, and her charting that day was so far behind that the night nurse had nothing current to report from. The jury found her 100% at fault for injuries after a knee replacement that ended in a below-the-knee amputation, and the $1,085,115 judgment was affirmed.

Pursuant to Dr. Smith's orders, Wickham should have received a neurovascular assessment around noon on February 18. Hummel did not document performing any neurovascular assessments in the morning after 8:00 a.m. throughout the afternoon. According to Hummel, she performed a neurovascular assessment on Wickham after she returned from physical therapy but did not document it.

Tobin v. Univ. Hosp. E., 2015-Ohio-3903

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Tenth District · 2015

The other side of it. The 0355 note ends with “will continue to monitor,” and the entries after it show the monitoring: 0415, 0500, 0530, 0610, 0645, each with what she found. The court found the nurse met the standard of care for a patient on narcotics.

Nurse Morton's handwritten progress notes show that she entered Bruce's room at least seven times in four hours. The notes state: 0300 Pt. admitted from ED, assessment started, teaching done, data base given to pt. Screening tool reviewed with pt. 0355 Pt. c/o RUQ pain radiating to flank. 2 mg Dilaudid given will continue to monitor. 0415 Pt. states pain ↓ tolerable now.

Write instead

0312 monitor shows 9-beat run of wide-complex tachycardia, rate approx 160, self-terminated. At bedside 0313: pt awake, denies chest pain or palpitations, BP 128/76, SpO2 96% RA. Strip saved. K 3.4 this AM.

The monitor alarm you silenced and what the chart says about it

Already charted it this way?

Not legal advice. Your facility policy, your state and your own attorney are what bind you. Every question and every quote here links to where it was published; read the source, not us. Written by a med-surg RN, ten years, day shift. Why there is no name on it.