shift is wild

The shift itself

Your name is on the lawsuit

A patient sued. Your name is on it. What happens now, and what do your notes do?

7 min read built on 6 full opinions updated 2026-09-21

Written by a med-surg RN, ten years, day shift. Why there is no name on it

Carol reacting to this topic

A patient sues, and your name is in the paperwork because you were part of the care. That alone does not mean anyone has decided you did something wrong.

But now your charting gets read closely. By people who were not there. It becomes the timeline, the memory aid, and the record of what you assessed, did, reported, and followed up on.

The short version

  • Do not pretend to remember more than you remember. Keep your memory separate from what the chart says.
  • Review the chart only through your facility’s approved process.
  • Do not change old charting. If something truly needs to be added, use the approved late-entry or addendum process.
  • Keep case talk inside the facility’s risk/legal process. Do not work it out in the hallway with coworkers.
  • Good notes are not speeches. They show assessment, action, notification, response, and timing.

What goes wrong

The usual mistake is trying to fix the chart after the lawsuit shows up.

A nurse gets a letter, panics, opens an old encounter, and adds something like: provider aware, no distress, care appropriate. The problem is not about being a bad person. The problem is how it looks: the chart now reads like it was written for the lawsuit, not for patient care.

EHRs show timing, authorship, edits, and addenda. A vague defensive note usually does not help anyone understand what happened.

The better move is boring. Preserve the original record. Use approved channels. If you find a true omission, label it as a late entry or addendum according to policy.

The chart should answer: What did you see? What did the patient say? What did you do? Who did you notify? What happened next?

It is not hypothetical

  • Marvin Mead v. Charles Palmer, Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 2015. A nurse was one of the named defendants, and the record included nursing notes and health-service requests. Link

The defendants’ appendix included transcripts of the depositions of Mead and dentist Timothy DeStigter; Mead’s dental records; and CCUSO documents, including Mead’s account statement, nursing notes, and a health-services request from Mead.

  • Manter v. CPF Senior Living – Northgate Park L.L.C., Ohio Court of Appeals, 2024. The case record discussed missing nursing notes and bathing documentation in an assisted-living care dispute. Link

if Paul was noncompliant with bathing, that was something she would expect to see in the nursing notes.

  • Vanner v. Lakewood Quarters Retirement Community, Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2013. A gap in nursing notes was called out in the malpractice record, even though the case also turned on other proof issues. Link

However the panel had concerns with the gap in nursing notes' from 5-7-06 to 5-11-06.

  • Schwenzfeier v. St. Peter's Health Partners, Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, 2023. Nursing notes were compared with provider observations during review of the patient’s hospital course. Link

Although there was a discrepancy between the nursing notes and Price's observations of decedent during her initial consult

What to write instead

Instead of writing Write this
Patient fell. MD aware. Family notified.0715 Patient found sitting on floor next to bed, back against bedside cabinet, non-skid socks on, call light on bed. Patient alert, states: I was trying to reach my water. Denies head strike. Vitals 0718: BP 138/76, HR 88, RR 18, SpO2 96 percent RA. Full skin check completed; 2 cm redness noted right elbow, no open area. Charge RN notified 0720. Provider [NAME] notified 0725; order received for neuro checks q4h x24h. Son [NAME] notified 0735.
Pt refused bath.1430 Shower offered with stand-by assist. Patient declined and stated: I do not want a shower today. Offered basin bath and later shower time; patient declined both. Explained reason for hygiene and skin checks. Visible skin to arms, legs, and back intact. Feet not assessed because patient declined sock removal. Charge RN [NAME] notified 1445. Will re-offer hygiene care on evening rounds.
Med late due to pharmacy.0900 Scheduled furosemide 40 mg PO not available in patient drawer or Pyxis. Pharmacy refill request sent 0903. Medication received 0947 and administered 0952. Patient denied shortness of breath before administration. BP 132/70, HR 82.
Patient confused.1015 Patient awake, oriented to name only. States current year is 1998 and location is home. Attempted to get out of bed x2 without assistance between 1000 and 1015. Bed alarm on, low bed position, call light within reach. Reoriented patient to room and plan of care. Provider [NAME] notified 1020 of change from prior assessment of A&O x3 at 0700.
Wound looks bad. MD aware.1605 Left heel wound assessed during dressing change. Open area 3.0 cm x 2.2 cm x 0.2 cm, wound bed 70 percent yellow slough and 30 percent pink tissue, scant serous drainage, no odor. Periwound skin macerated. Patient reports pain 6/10 during cleansing. Photo uploaded per policy. Provider [NAME] notified 1620; wound-care consult requested.
Family upset and blaming staff.1810 Daughter [NAME] at bedside voiced concern that patient had not received bath today and asked when skin was last checked. Reviewed today’s offered shower and patient’s declination. Offered to re-approach patient with daughter present. Patient agreed to partial bath at 1825. Sacrum inspected with CNA [NAME]; skin intact, blanchable redness present. Barrier cream applied.
No new orders.2215 Provider [NAME] notified by phone of temperature 101.4 F, HR 104, BP 118/64, RR 20, SpO2 95 percent RA, and patient report of chills. Provider gave order for acetaminophen 650 mg PO once and urine sample if patient voids. Order read back and entered. Acetaminophen given 2225.

Words that do the damage

Word or phrase Why it causes trouble Use instead
accidentallyJumps to a conclusion you may not knowDescribe what happened and what you observed
mistakeSounds like a legal conclusion, not an assessmentMedication/time/event facts, notification, patient response
stableMeans almost nothing by itselfVitals, mental status, pain score, respiratory status, skin findings
MD awareDoes not show what you reported or what came backProvider [NAME] notified at [TIME] of [FACTS]; [ORDERS/NO ORDERS/PLAN]
refusedCan sound final or judgmentalDeclined after education; alternatives offered; patient response
combativeLabels the patient instead of charting behaviorKicking toward staff, pulling at IV, yelling, unable to redirect
noncompliantBlames the patient and hides the useful detailsMissed dose, declined treatment, reason stated, education given
poor historianA label. It does not chart the problemPatient unable to state date of surgery; answers inconsistent; family contacted for history
no issuesTells the reader nothingSpecific assessment findings
will continue to monitorVague unless you say what you are actually doingNeuro checks q4h, recheck BP in 30 min, reassess pain at [TIME]

What the guidance says

  • Chart facts: assessment, patient statements, interventions, notifications, and response. Keep blame and self-defense out. (NSO, NursingCenter)
  • If you find an omission or error, use your facility’s late-entry or addendum process. Preserve the original record. Do not rewrite old charting. (NursingCenter, NSO)
  • Chart the care communication that matters: who you contacted, why, what you told them, what instructions or orders you received, and how the patient responded. (PMC, NSO)
  • Make timing and authorship clear: date, time, author, credentials, and signature according to your system. (NSO, Berxi)

Copy this

Chart entry after a patient event

``text [DATE] [TIME] Patient [WHAT HAPPENED]. Patient found/observed [POSITION/LOCATION/CONDITION]. Patient stated: [PATIENT WORDS]. Assessment completed: BP [BP], HR [HR], RR [RR], SpO2 [SPO2], temperature [TEMP], pain [PAIN SCORE/LOCATION], neuro status [NEURO STATUS], skin findings [SKIN FINDINGS]. Interventions completed: [INTERVENTIONS]. [NAME/TITLE] notified at [TIME] of [FACTS REPORTED]. Orders/instructions received: [ORDERS OR NO NEW ORDERS]. Patient response after intervention: [RESPONSE]. Family/representative [NAME] notified at [TIME], if applicable. Safety measures in place: [MEASURES]. ``

Late entry or addendum

``text Late entry for [DATE] [TIME]. Entry made on [DATE] at [TIME]. During [END-OF-SHIFT REVIEW/APPROVED CHART REVIEW], I noted that the following care was not documented in the original entry: [FACTUAL CARE PROVIDED]. At [TIME], patient assessment was [ASSESSMENT]. Intervention completed: [INTERVENTION]. Notification completed: [WHO WAS NOTIFIED] at [TIME] regarding [FACTS]. Patient response: [RESPONSE]. Original documentation otherwise unchanged. ``

Message to manager or risk contact after receiving lawsuit paperwork

``text [DATE] [TIME] I received [SUBPOENA/NOTICE/LETTER/REQUEST] related to care for [PATIENT INITIALS] on or about [DATE OF CARE]. I am notifying [MANAGER/RISK CONTACT NAME] and requesting direction through the facility process. I have not discussed the patient’s care outside approved channels. My current recollection is [NO INDEPENDENT RECOLLECTION / LIMITED RECOLLECTION OF [FACTS] / RECOLLECTION AS FOLLOWS: [FACTS]]. I will review records only through the approved process. ``

Internal event report

``text [DATE] [TIME] Event reported: [WHAT HAPPENED]. Location: [LOCATION]. Patient involved: [PATIENT INITIALS/MRN PER POLICY]. Staff present: [NAMES/TITLES]. Immediate patient assessment: [ASSESSMENT]. Immediate actions taken: [ACTIONS]. Notifications completed: [PROVIDER/CHARGE RN/MANAGER/FAMILY] at [TIMES]. Current patient condition: [CONDITION]. Follow-up needed: [FOLLOW-UP]. Report completed by [NAME], [CREDENTIALS], on [DATE] at [TIME]. ``

If you remember one thing

Two years later, your best memory aid is the chart. It needs to show what you saw, what you did, who you told, and how the patient responded.

Read the decisions yourself

Every case below is a published decision on CourtListener. Open them. Nothing on this page asks you to take our word for what a court said — and where we only had the search result rather than the full opinion, it says so.

All the decisions behind this guide, in one page — searchable by court, year, or what happened.

What people say on the floor

Nurses talking to each other about this, quoted as they wrote it. This is opinion, not a source. It is here because it shows what the argument actually is — the rules above come from the decisions and the published guidance, not from these threads.

What everyone else says

Guidance from professional bodies, insurers and other people who write about this. Useful, but it is advice, not law — that part is above.

How would you chart it?

This is the part we cannot research. If you have a way of writing this that has held up — put it here. No account, no name needed. Nothing that could identify a patient: no room numbers, no dates of birth, no MRNs. Use placeholders, the example still works.

700