shift is wild

When it goes sideways

Charting intrusive thoughts of self harm or harm to others when there is no plan

Because “denies SI/HI” is not a magic spell when the patient just told you the thought out loud.

6 min read built on 6 full opinions updated 2026-09-15

Written by a med-surg RN, ten years, day shift. Why there is no name on it

Maya reacting to this topic

A patient tells you about scary, unwanted thoughts of self-harm or hurting someone else. Then they clearly deny wanting to act on them. No plan. No intent. No psychotic symptoms.

Your note still needs more than denies SI/HI. The next clinician needs the actual picture: what the patient said yes to, what they denied, what you saw, and what safety step is in place.

The short version

  • Chart the thought itself: self-harm or harm to others, intrusive or unwanted, image/thought/urge, frequency, trigger, and distress level.
  • Keep the positives and negatives separate: endorsed intrusive thought, denies wish to die or harm, denies plan, intent, rehearsal, preparatory behavior, means/access, and command hallucinations.
  • Do not chart denies SI/HI if the patient did report self-harm or harm thoughts. Chart denies active suicidal intent or homicidal intent instead.
  • Add what you observed: calm or agitated, intoxicated or sober, responding to internal stimuli or not, cooperative or escalating.
  • Chart what you did next: screening tool completed, provider/charge nurse notified if required, observation level, room safety steps, safety plan, coping plan, and whether the patient agrees to notify staff if thoughts worsen.

What goes wrong

The common mistake is a note that looks clean but does not say enough: denies SI/HI, intrusive thoughts, no plan. The wording is not the real problem. The problem is that the note jams two different findings into one line.

If the patient reports an intrusive thought of cutting, then denies SI is not quite right. They did report a self-harm thought. What they denied was wanting to die, intending to act, having a plan, having access to means, or having psychotic symptoms driving the thought.

Same thing with harm-to-others thoughts. A patient can report an unwanted image of hitting someone and still deny homicidal intent. Your chart needs both parts: the intrusive content is present, and the desire, plan, intent, target behavior, weapon access, or command hallucinations are denied.

It is not hypothetical

No case in our set speaks to this directly.

What to write instead

Thin note Better note
Denies SI/HI. Intrusive thoughts noted. Will monitor.1410 Patient reports recurrent unwanted thought of cutting forearm when anxiety increases. Reports thought is distressing and unwanted. Denies wish to die, suicide plan, intent, rehearsal, preparatory behavior, or access to sharps. Denies auditory or visual hallucinations and denies command hallucinations. No self-harm behavior observed this shift. Affect anxious, cooperative with assessment. Unit suicide screen completed per policy. Provider notified. q15 min checks maintained. Patient agrees to notify staff if urge, intent, or ability to stay safe changes.
Passive SI, no plan.0930 Patient reports intermittent passive death wish on waking, lasting several minutes, without current desire to die. Denies active suicidal intent, plan, preparatory acts, or medication stockpiling. Denies hallucinations, paranoia, or belief that they must harm self. Thought process linear. Identifies sister and upcoming outpatient appointment as reasons to stay safe today. Safety plan reviewed. Patient verbalizes plan to use call light or approach staff if thoughts intensify.
Patient having thoughts of hurting roommate but denies HI.1800 Patient reports intrusive image of punching roommate during conflict. Describes thought as unwanted and frightening. Denies desire to harm roommate, denies homicidal intent, plan, specific time/place, threats, recent assault, or weapon access. Denies command hallucinations. No threatening behavior observed; speech normal volume, remained seated, accepted redirection. Charge RN and provider updated per unit process. Patient moved to quiet area and agreed to notify staff before approaching roommate.
No psychosis. Contracts for safety.Patient denies auditory hallucinations, visual hallucinations, command hallucinations, paranoia, or belief that self-harm is required. Not observed responding to internal stimuli. Reports intrusive unwanted image of self-harm but denies plan or intent. Safety plan reviewed with patient, including grounding exercise and notifying staff if thoughts become urges. Current observation level continued per order.
Pt anxious, says she might cut but would never do it.1235 Patient tearful and anxious, rates anxiety 8/10. Reports intrusive urge to cut when overwhelmed. Denies wanting to die, denies intent to cut, denies plan, denies access to sharps on unit, and denies past 24-hour rehearsal or preparatory behavior. No wounds noted on visible skin. RN stayed with patient for de-escalation, offered PRN per MAR, and removed loose razor from belongings per unit policy. Provider notified. Patient reports anxiety decreased to 5/10 after intervention.
Intrusive thoughts of crashing car. Safe.Patient reports unwanted image of swerving car into traffic while driving earlier today. Denies desire to die or harm others, denies plan, intent, impaired reality testing, intoxication, or command hallucinations. Currently inpatient; car keys secured with belongings. Calm, cooperative, future-oriented during assessment. Grounding technique practiced. Observation level unchanged after provider review.

Words that do the damage

Word or phrase Why it causes trouble Use instead
Denies SI/HIToo broad when the patient actually endorsed self-harm or harm-to-others thoughtsReports intrusive self-harm thought; denies wish to die, plan, intent, rehearsal, and means
No plan or intentTrue but incomplete by itselfDenies plan, intent, preparatory behavior, rehearsal, access to means, and command hallucinations
Intrusive thoughtsToo vague without contentIntrusive unwanted thought of cutting forearm; intrusive unwanted image of hitting roommate
Passive SICan mean different things to different cliniciansReports passive death wish; denies active suicidal intent, plan, or preparatory behavior
Contracts for safetyVague and easy to overreadSafety plan reviewed; patient agrees to notify staff by call light if urge or intent increases
No psychosisToo global as a stand-alone nursing noteDenies AH/VH, command hallucinations, paranoia; not observed responding to internal stimuli
SafeA conclusion without the supporting factsNo current plan or intent reported; observation level q15 min; provider notified; room safety check completed
Manipulative or attention-seekingJudgmental and not clinically specificPatient requested staff presence three times in one hour; tearful; accepted coping coaching
HI deniedCan conflict with reported harm thoughtsReports intrusive harm thought; denies desire to harm, target-specific plan, intent, threats, or weapon access

What the guidance says

  • Ask directly about self-harm or suicide. Keep it calm and normalized. Then separate the thought from plan, intent, and immediate safety. (NCBI Bookshelf, Nurseslabs)
  • Chart the specific safety findings, not just a risk label: whether ideation is present or denied, whether plan or intent is present or denied, and what observation or safety level is being used. (ICANotes, NurseChartingPro)
  • When inpatient self-harm risk is identified, chart the safety actions you actually took: observation level, removing hazards when indicated, or other unit safety measures. (PMC, NurseTogether)
  • If the patient agrees to seek staff help, document the concrete behavior: safety plan reviewed, coping step used, and patient agrees to alert staff if thoughts become urges or intent. (NurseChartingPro, allnurses)

If you remember one thing

Chart the intrusive thought as present. Then chart plan, intent, means, psychosis, observations, and safety actions separately.

Read the decisions yourself

Every case below is a published decision on CourtListener. Open them. Nothing on this page asks you to take our word for what a court said — and where we only had the search result rather than the full opinion, it says so.

All the decisions behind this guide, in one page — searchable by court, year, or what happened.

What people say on the floor

Nurses talking to each other about this, quoted as they wrote it. This is opinion, not a source. It is here because it shows what the argument actually is — the rules above come from the decisions and the published guidance, not from these threads.

What everyone else says

Guidance from professional bodies, insurers and other people who write about this. Useful, but it is advice, not law — that part is above.

How would you chart it?

This is the part we cannot research. If you have a way of writing this that has held up — put it here. No account, no name needed. Nothing that could identify a patient: no room numbers, no dates of birth, no MRNs. Use placeholders, the example still works.

700