Any note: how it gets read
Denies, never asked, or couldn't find out
A pre-filled No looks the same whether the patient answered, a son guessed, or nobody asked. How to chart the difference.
7 min read built on 0 cases updated 2026-10-05
Written by a med-surg RN, ten years, day shift. Why there is no name on it

All 11 sections
Your admission screen has boxes for seizures, allergies and falls, and every one of them already says No. Whoever reads the chart later sees three negatives. They have no way to tell whether the patient answered three questions, a daughter answered for him, or nobody asked anything at all. Here's how to make those three cases look different on paper.
The short version
- Keep three things apart in the record: asked and the answer was no, not asked yet, and asked but couldn't confirm. A blank or a default No hides all three.
- Say who answered: the patient, a named family member and their relationship, EMS, the prior chart, the pharmacy. If you used an interpreter, note it.
- Ask each item on its own. Seizures, allergies (drug, food, latex, environmental) and falls each get their own question. Don't fold them into one anything else? at the end.
- Couldn't get an answer? Write what you tried and when you'll try again. Unable to obtain alone tells nobody either.
- When new information comes in, add a timed entry that confirms or corrects the admission history. Don't quietly change the original box.
What to write instead
Left side: how the history often gets charted. Right side: who answered, and what's still unknown.
| How it gets charted | How it reads better |
|---|---|
Allergies: NKDA | Allergies: Pt states no known drug, food, latex or environmental allergies. Asked each category separately. Pt A&Ox4, answered without hesitation. |
Seizure hx: No | Seizure hx: Pt unable to answer reliably (oriented to self only). Wife [NAME] by phone states no seizures she is aware of; married 30 yrs. Prior records not yet available. Will review when received. |
Falls in last 6 months: No | Falls in last 6 months: Pt states none. Daughter at bedside states pt fell at home approx. 2 wks ago, no injury reported, did not seek care. Fall risk scored using daughter's report. |
Denies allergies | Allergy hx not obtained: pt intubated on arrival, no family present. EMS report lists no allergies. Outpatient pharmacy called 1430, awaiting callback. Allergy status UNCONFIRMED. Charge RN and provider aware. |
PMH: noncontributory | PMH per pt via Spanish interpreter (ID #[NUMBER]): HTN, DM2. Pt states no seizures, no falls. Asked about prior hospitalizations; pt unsure of dates. |
Unable to obtain history | History deferred: pt in acute pain, 9/10, unable to participate at 2210. Medicated per order. Will complete admission history when pain allows, target by 0200. |
Every version on the right does four things:
- Names who answered and how far you can trust them.
- Shows what was actually asked. Each category separately proves it wasn't one vague question.
- Labels what's still unknown as unknown, often in capitals so nobody misses it.
- Gives what happens next a time or a trigger.
Copy this
A. History obtained from the patient
``` [DATE] [TIME] Admission history obtained from patient at bedside. Patient alert and oriented x[NUMBER], answering questions appropriately. Interpreter: [NONE / LANGUAGE, INTERPRETER ID NUMBER].
Allergies: Asked separately about medication, food, latex and environmental allergies. Patient reports [NONE / LIST WITH REACTION]. Seizures: Asked about any history of seizures or seizure medication. Patient reports [NONE / DETAILS, LAST EPISODE DATE]. Falls: Asked about falls in the past [NUMBER] months. Patient reports [NONE / NUMBER OF FALLS, DATE, INJURY, WHERE].
Information not yet confirmed: [NONE / WHAT, AND HOW IT WILL BE CHECKED]. [YOUR NAME], RN ```
B. Patient unable to give a reliable history
``` [DATE] [TIME] Patient unable to provide reliable history: [REASON, E.G. ORIENTED TO SELF ONLY / INTUBATED / SEDATED / ACUTE PAIN].
Sources used:
- [NAME], [RELATIONSHIP], [IN PERSON / BY PHONE AT NUMBER], reports allergies: [ANSWER]; seizures: [ANSWER]; falls: [ANSWER]. Source states [HOW WELL THEY KNOW PATIENT'S HISTORY, E.G. LIVES WITH PATIENT / SEES PATIENT MONTHLY].
- [EMS RUN SHEET / PRIOR ADMISSION DATED [DATE] / OUTPATIENT PHARMACY]: [WHAT IT SHOWS].
UNCONFIRMED at this time: [ITEM(S) STILL UNKNOWN]. Attempts: [WHAT WAS TRIED AND WHEN, E.G. PHARMACY CALLED AT [TIME], NO ANSWER]. Plan: Re-ask patient when [CONDITION] or by [TIME]; follow up with [SOURCE]. Notified: [PROVIDER NAME] at [TIME], [CHARGE RN NAME] at [TIME]. [YOUR NAME], RN ```
C. Later entry when the history is confirmed or changes
``` [DATE] [TIME] Addendum to admission history entered [ORIGINAL DATE] [ORIGINAL TIME].
New information from [SOURCE, E.G. PATIENT NOW ALERT AND ORIENTED / DAUGHTER [NAME] / RECORDS RECEIVED FROM [FACILITY]]: [ALLERGY / SEIZURE / FALL] history: [WHAT IS NOW KNOWN]. This [CONFIRMS / UPDATES] the admission entry, which listed [ORIGINAL ENTRY] based on [ORIGINAL SOURCE].
Actions: [E.G. ALLERGY LIST UPDATED, PHARMACY NOTIFIED, FALL RISK RESCORED TO [SCORE], SEIZURE PRECAUTIONS STARTED PER ORDER]. Notified: [PROVIDER NAME] at [TIME]. [YOUR NAME], RN ```
Words that do the damage
| Word or phrase | Why it causes trouble | Use instead |
|---|---|---|
denies (on its own) | Says someone was asked and said no. Doesn't say who, or how reliable they were | Pt states no… / Wife [NAME] states no… + source reliability |
NKDA / NKA from a template | Often a default, not an answer. Doesn't say which categories were asked | List the categories asked: drug, food, latex, environmental |
negative | Sounds like a lab result. There was only a question, or none | Pt reports no… / not assessed |
noncontributory / unremarkable | Hides what was asked and what came back | Name the items asked and the answers |
per patient | Wrong if family, EMS or the old chart actually supplied it | per daughter [NAME] / per EMS run sheet / per prior admission [DATE] |
unable to obtain | Doesn't say why, what you tried, or when you'll try again | Reason + what you tried + plan with a time |
WNL in a history field | A history is an answer, not a measurement. There's no normal range | Write out the actual answer |
If you remember one thing
Every No in a history box should say who said it. Anything you couldn't confirm gets labeled unconfirmed.
What goes wrong
Usually someone clicks through a template that's already filled in. Or they fill it in themselves because the patient seemed fine.
The problem is that a history box stores an answer, not a question. Once Seizures: No is saved, it looks the same however it got there:
- the patient, alert and oriented, said no
- the patient, confused at 0300, nodded at everything
- the son, who sees him twice a year, thought probably not
- nobody asked, and the default stayed
The next nurse, the pharmacist and the hospitalist all read that as a confirmed negative. They plan around it. No seizure precautions get ordered, the antibiotic gets cleared, and the fall score comes out low. When the real history surfaces later, the chart still shows a clean negative that never was one.
Denies has its own problem. It's a strong word. It means somebody was asked a specific question and said no. If the person you asked couldn't answer reliably, denies claims more than you know.
What the guidance says
- When the history comes from someone other than the patient (family, EMS, old records), chart the source. (LibreTexts/04:_Obtaining_a_Complete_Health_History/4.02:_Data_Collection_and_Documentation>), Pabau)
- Ask about each kind of allergy separately: medication, food, environmental, latex. One general allergy question isn't enough. (LibreTexts/04:_Obtaining_a_Complete_Health_History/4.02:_Data_Collection_and_Documentation>), Pabau)
- Be specific and complete. Vague, catch-all wording leaves the next reader guessing what you found. (NSO, Pabau)
- Ask open questions, not yes/no or leading ones. A yes or a no tells you little about what the patient actually knows. (LibreTexts/04:_Obtaining_a_Complete_Health_History/4.02:_Data_Collection_and_Documentation>), Pressbooks)
It is not hypothetical
What happened in court — tap to read
No case in our set speaks to this directly.
What this one rests on
No published decision turned up for this question — we looked, and the searches are in the record. So this article stands on published guidance and on how the question is asked on the floor, not on a court opinion. That is a weaker footing than the rest of the guide, and you should know it before you rely on it. The decisions behind the other articles are all in one place.
What people say on the floor
Nurses talking to each other about this, quoted as they wrote it. Opinion, not a source.
Do file your report in writing, and retain a copy for yourself. Definitely speak to your manager about what the proper channels may be. It cannot hurt to keep your own notes of at least the dates and times when this charge nurse asks you to ...
r/nursing on Reddit: Charge nurse trys to get me to change my charting & notes, I chart it redditOne of the nurses that taught me how to be an ED nurse would always say "chart enough to get you out of court, but be careful not to chart enough to get you in court". Words I still live by ... I was a brand new ED nurse and had an infant that had obviously been beaten...a year later I was
r/nursing on Reddit: “Document/chart like you’re going to court” redditThe instructions, staff behavior, and charting language all make it clear that they are in control and they get to choose what happens. ... When it’s something important like blood thinners or Q2 turns, I write refused; when it’s something that is purely optional like pain meds I write declined ...
r/nursing on Reddit: Declined Vs Refused In Charting. redditWhether you forgot to do something, or didn't get a chance to do vitals, or whatever it is, you never chart something that you didn't see/do in an attempt to CYA. Even if it'll make you look bad for not checking on the pt or doing an intervention and you think it'll protect you i
r/nursing on Reddit: What are your documentation do’s and dont’s ? reddit
What everyone else says
Guidance from professional bodies, insurers and other people who write about this. Useful, but it is advice, not law — that part is above.
- Nursing Admission Assessment and Examination - NCBI - NIH ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Do's and don'ts of nursing documentation | NSO nso.com
- 4.2: Data Collection and Documentation - Medicine LibreTexts med.libretexts.org
- Nursing Notes Examples: Templates & How-To Guide | SimpleNursing simplenursing.com
- 7 Nursing Documentation Sample Templates & Expert Tips | Patient Talker Blog patienttalker.com
- MEDICAL ERRORS IN NURSING: PREVENTING DOCUMENTATION ERRORS - Medcom, Inc. medcominc.com
- Documentation of Health Assessment Findings – Health Assessment Guide for Nurses pressbooks.montgomerycollege.edu
- 5 Key Points About the E/M History Component - AAPC Knowledge Center aapc.com